Skip to main content

Keychron Q1 vs GMMK Pro: A Comparative Review

By
Introduction

Mechanical keyboards have become increasingly popular in recent years, and with a plethora of options available on the market, choosing the right keyboard can be a daunting task. In this blog post, I will be comparing two highly rated 75% mechanical keyboards - the Keychron Q1 and the GMMK Pro.

Build Quality and Sound Profile

The GMMK Pro has a stiff plate and does not move, making it suitable for mechanical switches that bottom out. This creates a noisy ring on the brass plate, especially with double-shot SA caps that produce a higher pitched metallic sound when bottoming out. The Q1, on the other hand, features a plate that sits on spongy spacers, which absorb the shock from typing, resulting in a smoother and softer typing experience. The plate also moves slightly when bottoming out, which is a unique feeling.

When it comes to sound, both keyboards are not significantly different, but the GMMK Pro tends to be a little more hollow due to its stiffer plate. The Keychron Q1, however, has brighter RGB out of the box and more options to customize it.


Remapping and Customization

Both keyboards are highly customizable, with the Keychron Q1 using VIA, which makes remapping the layout effortless. The GMMK Pro has the Glorious Core, which doesn't have as many options as VIA but does work well with QMK after recent updates. In my personal experience, I didn't need to remap the GMMK Pro after updating its firmware, but I did remap the Keychron Q1 to suit my personal preference.

Keycaps and Plate Material

The GMMK Pro has a brass plate and is compatible with Glorious Pandas and thick SA profile keycaps, making it ideal for a noisy typing experience. The Keychron Q1, on the other hand, is compatible with a wide range of keycaps, including SAs, which can be challenging to arrange due to their height variation and orientation from row to row.

Conclusion

Both the Keychron Q1 and the GMMK Pro are high-quality mechanical keyboards that cater to different preferences. The GMMK Pro is ideal for those who enjoy a noisy typing experience with brass plates and thick SA profile keycaps, while the Keychron Q1 is more suited for those who prefer a smoother and softer typing experience with brighter RGB lighting and a wider range of compatibility with keycaps. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on personal preference and the type of experience you are looking for in a mechanical keyboard.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Functional Programming in Scala for Working Class OOP Java Programmers - Part 1

By
Introduction Have you ever been to a scala conf and told yourself "I have no idea what this guy talks about?" did you look nervously around and see all people smiling saying "yeah that's obvious " only to get you even more nervous? . If so this post is for you, otherwise just skip it, you already know fp in scala ;) This post is optimistic, although I'm going to say functional programming in scala is not easy, our target is to understand it, so bare with me. Let's face the truth functional programmin in scala is difficult if is difficult if you are just another working class programmer coming mainly from java background. If you came from haskell background then hell it's easy. If you come from heavy math background then hell yes it's easy. But if you are a standard working class java backend engineer with previous OOP design background then hell yeah it's difficult. Scala and Design Patterns An interesting point of view on scala, is
14 comments
Read more

Alternatives to Using UUIDs

By
  Alternatives to Using UUIDs UUIDs are valuable for several reasons: Global Uniqueness : UUIDs are designed to be globally unique across systems, ensuring that no two identifiers collide unintentionally. This property is crucial for distributed systems, databases, and scenarios where data needs to be uniquely identified regardless of location or time. Standardization : UUIDs adhere to well-defined formats (such as UUIDv4) and are widely supported by various programming languages and platforms. This consistency simplifies interoperability and data exchange. High Collision Resistance : The probability of generating duplicate UUIDs is extremely low due to the combination of timestamp, random bits, and other factors. This collision resistance is essential for avoiding data corruption. However, there are situations where UUIDs may not be the optimal choice: Length and Readability : UUIDs are lengthy (typically 36 characters in their canonical form) and may not be human-readable. In URLs,
Post a Comment
Read more

Bellman Ford Graph Algorithm

By
The Shortest path algorithms so you go to google maps and you want to find the shortest path from one city to another.  Two algorithms can help you, they both calculate the shortest distance from a source node into all other nodes, one node can handle negative weights with cycles and another cannot, Dijkstra cannot and bellman ford can. One is Dijkstra if you run the Dijkstra algorithm on this map its input would be a single source node and its output would be the path to all other vertices.  However, there is a caveat if Elon mask comes and with some magic creates a black hole loop which makes one of the edges negative weight then the Dijkstra algorithm would fail to give you the answer. This is where bellman Ford algorithm comes into place, it's like the Dijkstra algorithm only it knows to handle well negative weight in edges. Dijkstra has an issue handling negative weights and cycles Bellman's ford algorithm target is to find the shortest path from a single node in a graph t
1 comment
Read more