Skip to main content

Alternatives to Using UUIDs

 Alternatives to Using UUIDs

UUIDs are valuable for several reasons:

  1. Global Uniqueness: UUIDs are designed to be globally unique across systems, ensuring that no two identifiers collide unintentionally. This property is crucial for distributed systems, databases, and scenarios where data needs to be uniquely identified regardless of location or time.

  2. Standardization: UUIDs adhere to well-defined formats (such as UUIDv4) and are widely supported by various programming languages and platforms. This consistency simplifies interoperability and data exchange.

  3. High Collision Resistance: The probability of generating duplicate UUIDs is extremely low due to the combination of timestamp, random bits, and other factors. This collision resistance is essential for avoiding data corruption.

However, there are situations where UUIDs may not be the optimal choice:

  1. Length and Readability: UUIDs are lengthy (typically 36 characters in their canonical form) and may not be human-readable. In URLs, query parameters, or user interfaces, shorter and more concise identifiers are preferable.

  2. Sorting and Indexing: UUIDs are not lexicographically sortable. When sorting data or creating indexes, shorter codes that maintain order are more efficient.

  3. Custom Requirements: Some applications have specific constraints, such as fitting within a fixed-length field or being URL-friendly. In such cases, alternatives can offer better solutions.

Now, let’s explore some alternatives to UUIDs, each with its own trade-offs:

  • nanoid: A compact, fast, and customizable alternative that generates short, URL-friendly strings. However, it sacrifices global uniqueness for brevity.

  • crypto.randomBytes: For purely random strings, this method provides strong randomness. However, it lacks readability and requires additional encoding.

  • ULID (Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier): Combining timestamp and randomness, ULIDs are shorter than UUIDs and maintain sort order. However, they are less widely supported.

  • Custom Encoding: By using Base 64 or other encodings, you can reduce length while maintaining uniqueness. However, encoding/decoding overhead must be considered.

Methods Overview

UUID- Globally unique across systems. - Standardized format (e.g., UUIDv4). - High collision resistance. - Widely supported.- Lengthy (36 characters). - Not lexicographically sortable. - May not be URL-friendly.
nanoid- Shorter and URL-friendly (21 characters by default). - Fast generation. - Customizable alphabet.- Not globally unique (collision risk increases with shorter length). - Not standardized.
crypto.random- Strong randomness. - Customizable length. - No external dependencies.- Not human-readable (hexadecimal or binary). - Requires additional encoding for readability.
ULID- Shorter than UUID (21 characters). - Lexicographically sortable. - Combines timestamp and randomness.- Not globally unique (collision risk increases with shorter length). - Not as widely supported.
Custom Encoding- Can reduce length (e.g., Base 64 encoding). - Customizable representation.- Encoding/decoding overhead. - May not be as unique as UUIDs. - Format depends on implementation.

Examples in Python

1. nanoid

from nanoid import generate

unique_id = generate(size=10)  # Example result: "V1StGXR8_Z"
print(f"nanoid: {unique_id}")

2. crypto.random

import os

def generate_random_hex(length):
   return os.urandom(length).hex()

random_hex = generate_random_hex(4)  # 8 hexadecimal characters
print(f"Random hex: {random_hex}")


from ulid import ulid

ulid_instance = ulid()
print(f"ULID: {ulid_instance}")

4. Custom Encoding (Base 64)

import base64
import uuid

def uuid_to_base64(uuid_str):
   uuid_bytes = uuid.UUID(uuid_str).bytes
   base64_id = base64.b64encode(uuid_bytes).decode("utf-8")
   return base64_id

original_uuid = "1b9d6bcd-bbfd-4b2d-9b5d-ab8dfbbd4bed"
base64_encoded = uuid_to_base64(original_uuid)
print(f"Base 64 encoded UUID: {base64_encoded}")


Popular posts from this blog

Functional Programming in Scala for Working Class OOP Java Programmers - Part 1

Introduction Have you ever been to a scala conf and told yourself "I have no idea what this guy talks about?" did you look nervously around and see all people smiling saying "yeah that's obvious " only to get you even more nervous? . If so this post is for you, otherwise just skip it, you already know fp in scala ;) This post is optimistic, although I'm going to say functional programming in scala is not easy, our target is to understand it, so bare with me. Let's face the truth functional programmin in scala is difficult if is difficult if you are just another working class programmer coming mainly from java background. If you came from haskell background then hell it's easy. If you come from heavy math background then hell yes it's easy. But if you are a standard working class java backend engineer with previous OOP design background then hell yeah it's difficult. Scala and Design Patterns An interesting point of view on scala, is

Dev OnCall Patterns

Introduction Being On-Call is not easy. So does writing software. Being On-Call is not just a magic solution, anyone who has been On-Call can tell you that, it's a stressful, you could be woken up at the middle of the night, and be undress stress, there are way's to mitigate that. White having software developers as On-Calls has its benefits, in order to preserve the benefits you should take special measurements in order to mitigate the stress and lack of sleep missing work-life balance that comes along with it. Many software developers can tell you that even if they were not being contacted the thought of being available 24/7 had its toll on them. But on the contrary a software developer who is an On-Call's gains many insights into troubleshooting, responsibility and deeper understanding of the code that he and his peers wrote. Being an On-Call all has become a natural part of software development. Please note I do not call software development software engineering b